bookmark_borderNeed to Prepare for Millions of Climate Change Refugees

World needs to prepare for ‘millions’ of climate displaced: U.N.
January 21, 2020

Reuters reported:
DAVOS, Switzerland (Reuters) – The world needs to prepare for millions of people being driven from their homes by the impact of climate change, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Speaking to Reuters at the World Economic Forum, Filippo Grandi said a U.N. ruling this week meant those fleeing as a result of climate change deserved international protection, and that it had broad implications for governments.

The U.N. Human Rights Committee made the landmark ruling on Monday in relation to Ioane Teitiota, from the Pacific nation of Kiribati, who brought a case against New Zealand after authorities denied his claim of asylum.

“The ruling says if you have an immediate threat to your life due to climate change, due to the climate emergency, and if you cross the border and go to another country, you should not be sent back, because you would be at risk of your life, just like in a war or in a situation of persecution,” Grandi said.

“We must be prepared for a large surge of people moving against their will,” he said. “I wouldn’t venture to talk about specific numbers, it’s too speculative, but certainly we’re talking about millions here.”

Potential drivers include wildfires like those seen in Australia, rising sea levels affecting low-lying islands, the destruction of crops and livestock in sub-Saharan Africa and floods worldwide, not least in parts of the developed world.

Whereas for most of its 70 years UNHCR, the UN’s refugee agency, has worked to assist those fleeing poorer countries as a result of conflict, climate change is more indiscriminate.

“It is further proof that refugee movements and the broader issue of migration of populations … is a global challenge that cannot be confined to a few countries,” said Grandi.
70 MILLION DISPLACED

Yet the convention relating to the status of refugees, signed in 1951, made no provision for climate change as a reason for people to flee their country and seek asylum elsewhere. As climate impacts grow, legal questions become more complicated.

UNHCR, whose budget has risen from $1 billion a year in the early 1990s to $8.6 billion in 2019 as conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria have forced civilians to flee, now assists more than 70 million forcibly displaced people.

Turkey is the largest recipient, with more than 4 million refugees and asylum seekers, the vast majority from Syria. That has strained Turkey’s public finances and led President Tayyip Erdogan to demand more assistance from Europe.

Last November, Erdogan threatened to open the door for Syrian refugees to head to Europe unless the European Union stepped up, and he is now calling for the “resettlement” of up to 1 million Syrians in the north of their homeland.
Slideshow (12 Images)

Grandi said European governments needed to think hard about solutions to the migrant crisis, which has affected them since 2015, but also show more understanding of Turkey’s situation.

“We must recognise that, for the past several years (Turkey)has been hosting the largest refugee population in the world,” he said. “There’s a lot of political talk. I concentrate on the substance of this, which is ‘let’s strengthen Turkey’s ability to host refugees until they can go back safely, voluntarily to their countries’.”

More on Climate Change Refugees

More on Climate Change

bookmark_borderThe True Costs (and Benefitlessness) of a Trump Economy

January 23, 2020

What are the costs and benefits to the United States under a Trump economy?

Financial Analysis: Current State of Affairs
First, start with a financial analysis — a snapshot of the current economic health of the nation. What would a financial analysis that is similar to an individual applying for a bank loan, or a married couple visiting a financial planner for their retirement plan, look like? What are the assets and liabilities? What type of assets and liabilities are in your portfolio? What are your saving patterns? Did you get a large gift from your parents or have you been showing a strong pattern of saving over time? What is your income? Have you made dubious loans to yourself? Where does your income come from? What is your credit history?

A financial analysis of the U.S.A. results in a failing grade.

Impacts of Fiscal and Monetary Policy
After examining the current state of affairs, examine the fiscal policies of the Executive Branch and the monetary policies pushed onto the Federal Reserve. The Trump administration has taken extremely negative positions with free-trade, as well as, jeopardized the standing of the world reserve currency.

Tariffs
The Trump administration has destroyed the United States leadership in free-trade. Huge taxes were placed upon the American public through the use of tariffs. The tariffs were put on goods and services from around the world and paid for by the American consumer. The placement of tariffs have circumvented congress’ oversight and consumer protection considerations. Not only do tariffs introduce new taxes on the population, they also destroy trade relationships with other countries. That is to say, tariffs and retaliatory tariffs cause foreign countries to look elsewhere for their imports. For example, China’s retaliatory tariffs on agriculture resulted in China developing new trade partnerships that do not include the USA.

Here is a partial list of Trump Tariffs:
Solar panels: 15 – 30%
Washing machines: 16 – 50%
Steel and aluminum: 10 – 25%
Chinese products: 15 – 50%
South Korean products: 25%

More tariffs were placed on India, Canada, Mexico, the European Union and others.

Tariffs not only have a direct impact on U.S. current affairs, but they will leave everlasting damage.

Inflation
The overall Trump economic policy has put the economy at risk of high inflation and interest rates.

Inflation Update: Immigration and the Wage Inflation Spiral (June 12, 2022)
An important factor in the 2022 record inflation situation can be traced back to the Trump immigration policy.

The US has stagnant population growth (as does the UK, EU, etc. Japan has a declining population.)

During the Trump administration, the US drastically curtailed immigration. The Biden administration continues to do so today.

The result has been wage inflation. The wage inflation that started in 2018 began the overall inflation spiral that continues today. A wage inflation spiral happens when the initial wage inflation is canceled out by the price inflation requiring further wage inflation to keep up with the price inflation… the increase prices require more wage inflation for employees to keep pace with the cost of living… the subsequent rise in wages results in the need to raise prices to pay the workers… and round and round we go.

The solutions are to either increase our population (through immigration) and/or increase our productivity by eliminating the need for humans.

How the Inflation Spiral Started: Immigration
The Trump administration’s policy on immigration and building The Wall have a devastating impact on the economy. The U.S. economy is a capitalistic system based on population growth. The birth rate in America is close to zero percent. In order to maintain the standard of living, the country needs to gain millions of people through immigration. The Trump policies have attempted to eliminate immigration.
— Daniel Brouse (2020)

* “Over the course of four years, the Trump administration set an unprecedented pace for executive action on immigration, enacting 472 administrative changes that dismantled and reconstructed many elements of the U.S. immigration system. Humanitarian protections were severely diminished. The U.S.-Mexico border became more closed off. Immigration enforcement appeared more random. And legal immigration became out of reach for many. All of this was accomplished nearly exclusively by the executive branch, with sweeping presidential proclamations and executive orders, departmental policy guidance, and hundreds of small, technical adjustments.” — Migration Policy Institute’s Four Years of Profound Change (2022>

* “After years of wage stagnation, we are finally seeing rising wages,” Donald Trump (State of the Union 2018)
“The Employment Cost Index, a measure of salary and benefit costs, registered a 2.6 percent gain for the full year, tied for the best since 2007.” — CNBC (January 31, 2018)

* From December of 2020 through January of 2022, nominal wages and salaries were up 4.5 percent, the fastest increase since 1983. — Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

World Reserve Currency
“A nation that prints its own currency, and that currency is the world reserve currency, is not threatened by deficits. Until that currency stops being the reserve currency,” said Sidd Mukherjee.

The U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency has given the United States an unfair economic advantage. The U.S. has been able to “print” and borrow money in ways that break the rules of economics; however, the Trump administration has jeopardized the standing of the dollar as the world reserve currency.

The major economic powers of the world entered into a nuclear arms deal with Iran called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). In October of 2017, Trump began pulling out of the agreement. On May 8, 2018, Trump announced the United States withdrawal from JCPOA and declared economic warfare on Iran. The warfare included “tough new sanctions” on Iran. The other countries to the treaty attempted to maintain the JCPOA by developing a new system to by-pass the world reserve currency.

Germany, France and Britain officially set up a European mechanism to facilitate non-dollar trade with Iran, the Instrument in Support of Trade Exchanges (Instex). Russia and other countries have since joined Instex.

Risk Management
The future of the nation is dependent on current risk management. “On the High Risk List; the fragmentation, overlap, and duplication annual report; natural disasters and climate change; and other topics,” reports the General Accounting Office of the USA. Pollution, in particular air pollution, is also a substantial risk. CO2, methane and other greenhouse gases have all increased under the Trump plan. Trump has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement and has consistently called climate change a hoax.

It’s never a good idea to say “never”… but, risk-management-denial always increases the probability of a worse case scenario.

Not only is our nation’s current cash-flow severely hemorrhaging due to extreme weather events (and other costs associated with climate change), but this is just the tip of the iceberg. Climate change denial is risk-management-denial.

Pollution and Climate Change Costs Unsustainable

Trump recently stated, “We have the cleanest air.” This is a boldfaced lie. Air pollution in the form of particulates and ozone are a severe health emergency in the United States.

“According to a 2009 report, around ’60 percent of Americans live in areas where air pollution has reached unhealthy levels that can make people sick.’ Air pollution can cause a variety of health problems including, but not limited to infections, behavioral changes, cancer, organ failure, and even premature death.” (Wikipedia) Air pollution is the number one cause of illness in the world and the second leading cause of death. The cost of air pollution can not be contained by one country — pollution knows no borders. It is estimated 8 million people a year die from air pollution.

A report by Stanford and Carnegie Mellon University states, “Air pollution negatively impacts the U.S. economy, costing the U.S. roughly 5 percent of its yearly gross domestic product (GDP) in damages ($790 billion in 2014). The highest costs come from early deaths, attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5).” The number had been falling up to 2016, but Trump has dramatically undermined clean air laws. As of December 2019, Trump had rolled back 95 environmental protection laws.

Air pollution also contributes to the climate change crisis, and in an exponential feedback loop, climate change contributes to air pollution. For instance, the wildfires in California and Australia were made more severe due to human induced climate change. The wildfires resulted in air pollution that costs billions of dollars in damages, illness and death. The wildfires also contributed to greenhouse gases and climate change that will result in more wildfires.

Though a huge cost, the climate change / air pollution feedback loop is just a small cost of climate change. Not only has the Trump administration not properly assessed the risk of climate change, the administration has undermined efforts to mitigate climate change. Even more brazen, the administration has enacted policies that hasten the devastation of global warming.

The costs of climate change are huge. The Hamilton Project and the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research reports, “Damages to the U.S. economy grow with temperature change at an increasing rate.” The Washington Post reports, “Climate change could cost the U.S. economy up to 10.5% of GDP by 2100.” The cost of not adapting to climate change will likely cripple the American economy.

The current costs, the costs of not adapting, and the costs of not preventing climate change are overwhelming to calculate. Take flood insurance as an example. Sea level rise and extreme weather events have redrawn floodmaps and bankrupted the National Flood Insurance Program. What flood insurance that is still available has started a series of exponential increases in premiums. Real estate along the coasts and flood prone areas will become worthless in the coming years.

The other costs associated with the Trump administration’s climate change policy is too long to list.  Fossil fuel elimination and climate change mitigation our essential for risk management.

Immigration and the Acquisition Of Private Property
The Trump administration’s policy on immigration and building The Wall have a devastating impact on the economy. First, the U.S. economy is a capitalistic system based on population growth. The birth rate in America is close to zero percent. In order to maintain the standard of living, the country needs to gain millions of people through immigration. The Trump policies have attempted to eliminate immigration.

Also of a long-term negative impact is the building of The Wall. Funds to build the wall were diverted against the will of congress. The funds were then used to seize private land. The land seizures and The Wall have had a major impact on nature preserves and indigenous sacred grounds. Just as detrimental are the eminent domain acquisitions of individuals’ land. Socialization of private property is an attack on the economic system. The costs to the economy and freedom are not quantifiable.

Income Inequality
The Trump administration’s policies have widened the economic divide and income inequality in the United States.  Trump said, “inequality is down.” The next day federal data was released and the Washington Post reported, “The separation between rich and poor from 2017 and 2018 was greater than it has ever been.”

“Wages are up, and inequality is down. Something that people don’t like writing about.” Trump said during a press conference following the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York. Again, this is not true. The Economic Policy Institute reports, “Slow wage growth is a key sign of how far the U.S. economy remains from a full recovery. Nominal wage growth since the recovery officially began in mid-2009 has been low and flat.”

BENEFITS
There have not been any real benefits from Trump policies. Some people try to point to employment and tax cuts.

Employment
Employment and unemployment numbers became irrelevant as an economic indicator in the 1990’s. The internet and the worldwide web transformed the definition of employment. In addition, you would need to deduct all the jobs lost through the elimination of most temporary work visas. Many of these jobs have not been filled, especially in agriculture, horticulture and hospitality. Billions of dollars in wages and taxes have been eliminated through the Trump immigration policy. These numbers are not included in employment figures.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, 7.6 million people were unemployed. At the end of 2018, 9.0 million people remained unemployed. Yet, Trump claims to have created 5 million new jobs. Do the math.

In January 2020, Trump boasted at a campaign rally in Wildwood, NJ that “factory jobs were the best ever in the history of the United States.” Reuters reported, U.S. factory sector in deepest slump in more than 10 years. “The U.S. manufacturing sector fell into its deepest slump in more than a decade in December as the U.S.-China trade war kept a lid on factory output, orders and employment…. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) said its index of national factory activity fell to 47.2 last month from 48.1 in November. It was the lowest reading since June 2009 and, coupled with readings for both new orders and factory employment at multi-year lows, thwarted expectations for a leveling off in the pace of decline in a sector buffeted by trade tensions. ”

Tax Cuts
The only beneficial tax cut that has been made by the administration was to lower corporate taxes. Corporate profits are already taxed as income to shareholders. The corporate tax is double taxation. A fair tax policy would not have corporate taxation. However, the other Trump trade and tax policies’ negative impacts far outweigh the positive impact of a reduction in corporate tax rates.

But, What About Obama?
Obama increased the national debt by about $1 trillion/year. Trump is increasing the national debt by about $1 trillion/year. What makes Trump worse than Obama — Trump is suppose to be a fiscally conservative Republican. Obama wasn’t suppose to be. So, for that reason, Trump’s deceit makes it worse than Obama. Trump is not stopping the problem. Worse yet, he is contributing to the problem at the same rate as Obama, as well as, putting the future economy at risk through bad trade and environmental policies. Trump is trying to con the American public into a false narrative on the economy.  In fact, this is not “the best economy ever. Rather, it is the worst economy ever.

Morning Brew reported, U.S. Budget Deficit to Exceed $1 Trillion in 2020. “The U.S. budget deficit will top $1 trillion this year, according to a new report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). What that means: The government will spend $1.02 trillion more than it collects in 2020. The widening deficit is a result of the 2017 tax cuts and an increase in spending on federal programs.”

By 2020, the debt to GDP ratio hit its highest level ever at 125%.

Conclusion
The national debt is unsustainable. The debt, risk-management-denial, deceit, nationalism, and greed will sink our ship.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The responsibility an economist accepts is to determine the “costs and benefits of our actions on society.” Then, attempt to convert the difference into dollars. Is economics opinion? That depends on your value of the costs and benefits of your actions on society.

bookmark_borderWorst Economy Ever: United States Financial Health in 2020 Hindsight

by Daniel Brouse
Economist, Pi Gamma Mu

January 22, 2020

The U.S. economy is the worst in history. There are several measures for the health of an economy. One of the best is the “debt to GDP” ratio. National debt divided by the nation’s gross domestic product = debt to GDP ratio.

During 2019, the nation’s debt to GDP ratio reached a record high (when the Fed’s balance sheet is included.)

Calculation:
23.177 trillion $ 2019 Debt
3.8 trillion $ assets on the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet
_______________
26.977‬ trillion
/ divided by the GDP
21.439 trillion
_______________
125.83% debt to GDP ratio

One hundred and twenty-five percent is the highest debt to GDP ratio in the history of the United States of America.

When an individual borrows money, their debt to income ratio usually can not exceed 36%. The debt to income ratio is a reliable indicator of the ability to repay a loan. Exceptions are made for young borrowers with likely prospects of wage growth. The growth rate of the US GDP has been flat and is projected to go lower.

When a nation borrows money, the debt to GDP ratio also determines the ability to repay the debt. Therefore, it is safe to say the U.S. is in the worst economic position ever.

It’s not really a good idea to compare the debt to GDP ratio to other countries or periods in time. A better rule of thumb would be a ratio under 40% and preferably close to 0; however, for those that are curious:
Denmark — 35%
Switzerland — 33%
Australia — 47%
China — 47%
UK — 87%
Mozambique — 119%

The USA historically has had a ratio in the 30% range from 1967 through 1984. The last time the ratio came close to today’s 125% was in 1945 – 1947 when the ratio hit 119% due to the effects of WWII, the recession, and President Truman’s economic policies.

Why the Fed’s Balance Sheet is Important
It is very important to include the assets on the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet in the calculation. The reason being — the Fed should not have any assets on its balance sheet. When the Fed buys assets from the Treasury, the government is in fact borrowing the money from itself. The government is “printing” money. The government is competing with the private sector to lend the government money. Interest rates are artificially low due to the lack of competition. Borrowing more money to repay debt is unsustainable.

The U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)
The GAO has the best accountants in the world. The GAO says: “The Comptroller General testified before Congress about the government’s unsustainable fiscal outlook, the need for a long-term plan to address growing debt, and other aspects of the nation’s fiscal health.” The comptroller concludes the continued growth of public debt is unsustainable. “This statement is based on our prior work on the High Risk List; the fragmentation, overlap, and duplication annual report; natural disasters and climate change; and other topics.”

Worst Economy Ever
The U.S. economy is currently the worst in the nation’s history. At no time in history has our debt + Fed assets / GDP = 125%. The economy is unsustainable.

bookmark_borderClimate Change and Disaster Displacement

The UN Refugee Agency reports:

Research indicates that the Earth’s climate is changing at a rate that has exceeded most scientific forecasts. Some families and communities have already started to suffer from disasters and the consequences of climate change, which has forced them to leave their homes in search of a new beginning.

UNHCR recognizes that the consequences of climate change are extremely serious, including for refugees and other people of concern. The Global Compact on Refugees, adopted by an overwhelming majority in the UN General Assembly in December 2018, directly addresses this growing concern. It recognizes that ‘climate, environmental degradation and natural disasters increasingly interact with the drivers of refugee movements.’

The impacts of climate change are numerous. Limited natural resources, such as drinking water, are likely to become even scarcer in many parts of the world. Crops and livestock struggle to survive in climate change ‘hotspots’ where conditions become too hot and dry, or too cold and wet, threatening livelihoods and exacerbating food insecurity.

People are trying to adapt to the changing environment, but many are being forcibly displaced from their homes by the effects of climate change and disasters, or are relocating in order to survive. New displacement patterns, and competition over depleted natural resources can spark conflict between communities or compound pre-existing vulnerabilities.

People displaced across borders in the context of climate change and disasters may in some circumstances be in need of international protection. Refugee law therefore has an important role to play in this area. UNHCR is providing protection and assistance for many people forcibly displaced by the effects of climate change and disasters, among other drivers, and is working to increase their resilience.
UNHCR’s role in addressing climate change and disaster-related displacement

UNHCR’s work on climate change and disaster displacement covers four main areas:

Legal advice, guidance and the development of norms to support the enhanced protection of the rights of people displaced in the context of disasters and climate change.
Promoting policy coherence to ensure that issues of disaster displacement are effectively mainstreamed across relevant areas.
Research to fill gaps that underpin this operational and policy work.
Field-based activities to address internal and cross-border disaster displacement; to reduce the environmental impact of refugee settlements and ensure sustainable responses to displacement; risk reduction activities and others which may contribute to efforts to avert, minimize and address displacement.

Through its participation in global policy processes, UNHCR has played a pioneering role in raising awareness about climate change as a driver of displacement and the need to address protection for people displaced in the context of disasters.

In 2018, extreme weather events such as severe drought in Afghanistan, Tropical Cyclone Gita in Samoa, and flooding in the Philippines, resulted in acute humanitarian needs. According to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, there were 18.8 million new disaster-related internal displacements recorded in 2017. Most disaster displacement linked to natural hazards and the impacts of climate change is internal, with those affected remaining within their national borders. However, displacement across borders also occurs, and may be interrelated with situations of conflict or violence.

In all cases, people displaced by disasters have needs and vulnerabilities that must be addressed. People already displaced for reasons other than disasters linked to natural hazards – including refugees, stateless people, and the internally displaced – often reside in climate change ‘hotspots’ and may be exposed to secondary displacement. Moreover, similar impacts on their home areas can inhibit their ability to safely return.

UNHCR plays a leading role in the Global Protection Cluster for protecting and assisting people who are forcibly displaced inside their countries and cannot return safely home. When called upon to intervene, can deploy emergency teams and provide concrete support in terms of registration, documentation, family reunification and the provision of shelter, basic hygiene and nutrition. UNHCR is also a standing invitee to the Steering Group of the Platform on Disaster Displacement, in follow-up to the Nansen Initiative on cross-border disaster displacement. The Platform on Disaster Displacement is a State-led initiative focused on the implementation of the Nansen Initiative’s Protection Agenda.

UNHCR has developed planned relocation guidance together with Georgetown University and other partners for the relocation of at-risk populations to protect them from disasters and the impacts of climate change while respecting their human rights. Furthermore, UNHCR has provided technical support to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change process since 2008, including through the Advisory Group on Human Mobility and Climate Change, and in its role as a member of the Task Force on Displacement (TFD) mandated by the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism on Loss and Damage.

In 2018, in the implementation of the Workplan of the TFD, UNHCR commissioned a mapping on existing international and regional guidance and tools on averting, minimizing, addressing and facilitating durable solutions to displacement related to the adverse impacts of climate change and contributed to the development of recommendations for integrated approaches to avert, minimize and address displacement linked to the adverse effects of climate change that were presented at COP24 and adopted by Parties. UNHCR remains committed to continue providing technical support to Parties in implementing the Paris Agreement, and to actively participating in the TFD under its renewed mandate.
‘Climate refugees’?

The term “climate refugee” is often used in the media and other discussions. However, this phrase can cause confusion, as it does not exist in international law. A “refugee” is defined as a person who has crossed an international border “owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion” (1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees). In some contexts, the definition extends to persons fleeing “events seriously disturbing public order” (1969 OAU Convention; 1984 Cartagena Declaration). Climate change affects people inside their own countries, and typically creates internal displacement before it reaches a level where it displaces people across borders. There may be situations where the refugee criteria of the 1951 Convention or broader refugee criteria of regional refugee law frameworks may apply, for example if drought-related famine is linked to situations of armed conflict and violence – an area known as “nexus dynamics.” Regardless, the term “climate refugee” is not endorsed by UNHCR, and it is more accurate to refer to “persons displaced in the context of disasters and climate change.”
Nexus Dynamics

Recent history has borne witness to cross border movements in situations where conflict or violence has interacted with disaster or adverse effects of climate change. Yet, research on how destination States have used refugee law to provide international protection in these complex situations has traditionally been limited. To address this knowledge gap and to identify policy and practical solutions to strengthen the implementation of refugee law based international protection when cross-border movements occur in the context of nexus dynamics, in 2018 UNHCR undertook the study: In Harm’s Way: International protection in the context of nexus dynamics between conflict or violence and disaster or climate change.

It examines the protection provided to people displaced across borders by countries of destination in specific situations in the Horn of Africa and the Americas, where conflict or violence interacted with climate change or disaster. A brief overview of the study, which sets out the scope, key observations and recommendations, is available in English, French and Spanish. The study’s findings build on UNHCR’s Legal considerations on refugee protection for people fleeing conflict and famine affected countries and indicate that refugee law frameworks can be applicable in situations where nexus dynamics are present. Nevertheless, there are still data and knowledge gaps in this area that need to be addressed.

bookmark_borderThe Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate

The latest Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change (IPCC)Special Report high lights the urgency of prioritizing timely, ambitious and coordinated action to address unprecedented and enduring changes in the ocean and cryosphere.

The report states the sea level is rising much faster than previously forecast. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns one billion people will be affected as soon as 2050 because of rising sea levels, water shortages and food insecurity.

SROCC Press Release ENGLISH

SROCC_FinalDraft_FullReport

bookmark_borderDo You Need Flood Insurance?

by Daniel Brouse and Sidd Mukherjee

There’s a thing about climate change and a rising sea level that took me a while to grasp… a lot of the water isn’t actually in the sea. As more water accumulates in the sea and the temperature rises, more energy is also being stored in the sea. Now, we are seeing more of that sea and energy transferred to the land.

More energy is being stored in the sea. One of the results is higher sea level. But another is more intense rain on land, the water comes inland through the air as well. As you may have noticed, the rising sea level is causing flooding in Pennsylvania, as well as, sinking the shore.

“Climate change is in general increasing the frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall storms,” said Andreas Prein, a project scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research. “If you look at the records, mostly it’s the water that kills most people.”

“The ingredients are there for a real catastrophe if the flood control infrastructure simply gets overwhelmed,” he said.

The New York Times reported: In recent years, researchers have found that hurricanes have lingered longer, as Barry is expected to do, and dumped more rainfall — a sign of climate change, said Christina Patricola, a research scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and a co-author of a study that found that climate change is making tropical cyclones wetter.

Though storms can form at any time, the Atlantic hurricane season stretches from June 1 through Nov. 30 because that is typically when the Atlantic Ocean’s waters are warm enough to sustain storms. But the oceans are now warmer than ever: They have absorbed more than 90 percent of the heat caused by human-released greenhouse gas emissions.

Do you need flood insurance?

  • Homeowners insurance does NOT cover flooding
  • Flood insurance is obtained through the government’s flood insurance program
  • Flood insurance does not cover the basement of a house
  • Flood insurance covers a lifetime maximum of $250,000 in coverage
    This means if you make a claim for $150,000 the maximum coverage for the life of the property drops to $100,000.

The Human Induced Climate Change Experiment

bookmark_borderThe Hijacking of the Republican Party

Leading up to the Presidential election of 2016, it was obvious the Trump campaign had made a dirty deal with some Russians; however, it was less obvious the deal Trump made with the devil — Evangelical Christians.

In June of 2016, Trump met with several hundred evangelical leaders in New York City. He agreed to advance the movement’s opposition to abortion and LGBTQ rights. Trump embraced “Project Blitz’s” legislative and judicial agenda. Project Blitz is a collection of religious bills written by the Congressional Prayer Caucus. Trump promised to appoint judges that would overthrow Roe V. Wade, defund planned parenthood, eliminate same sex marriages, and allow discrimination of LGBTQ rights.

“PURPOSE:
To protect the free exercise of traditional Judeo-Christian religious values and beliefs in the public square, and to reclaim and properly define the narrative which supports such beliefs.” — Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation, Inc.

Since the election, President Trump has appointed more judges on federal appeals courts than any previous President in modern history. The most notable appointment was Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Al Jazerra reported, “One group had backed Kavanaugh’s nomination from the beginning: The religious right in the US, which is a strategic, highly organized minority that has found itself more powerful than ever under President Donald Trump.”

Under the Trump presidency, non-white and non-Christians have been under attack. The “Travel Ban” targets Muslims. “The Wall” is proposed to keep out “criminals, rapists and drugs.” Wikipedia reports, The Trump administration embraced the Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy (RAISE) Act in August 2017.[23][24] The RAISE Act seeks to reduce levels of legal immigration to the United States by 50% by halving the number of green cards issued. The bill would also impose a cap of 50,000 refugee admissions a year and would end the visa diversity lottery.

The damage Trump has caused to the Republican Party may best be described by Michael Gerson in the Washington Post, “The damage radiates further. Trump evangelicals are blessing the destruction of public norms on civility, decency and the importance of public character.

And the ultimate harm is to the reputation of faith itself. The identification of evangelical Christianity with ethno- ­nationalism and white grievance is a grave matter. Evangelical Christians hardly distinguished themselves during the civil rights movement. Some used Christian academies as a cover for continued segregation. Getting this issue wrong again would be particularly damning in a nation — and in Christian churches — growing inexorably more diverse.”

Trump has led the Evangelical Christians in hijacking the Republican Party for their religious agenda.

REFERENCES

Church Of Trump

Transcript: Donald Trump’s closed-door meeting with evangelical leaders

Radical Christian Terrorists and the Zombie Apocalypse

Terror Threats in the USA

Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation, Inc.: Project Blitz

Trump evangelicals have sold their souls

bookmark_borderFlood Insurance Rates Rising

“your flood insurance premiums could rise up to 18 percent each year”

A recent article in the Miami Herald reports:

“FEMA confirmed to the Miami Herald that it is looking into switching to risk-based pricing in 2020, which would end the subsidies most coastal communities enjoy on their flood insurance premiums and show the true dollar cost of living in areas repeatedly pounded by hurricanes and drenched with floods — like South Florida.

“That means insurance is about to become very expensive, and it kind of sounds the bell that these are high-risk areas,” said Wayne Pathman, a Miami-based land use attorney and chair of the city’s Sea Level Rise Committee.

Premiums through the National Flood Insurance Policy are already rising an average of eight percent this year; the first wave of pricier policies started in April. That brings the average annual price (including surcharges) for a policy holder to $1,062.

It’s all part of a strategy to make the NFIP financially stable. The program is $20 billion in debt (and that’s after the government forgave $16 billion of that debt last year) because it pays out much more each year than it takes in.”

More about Flood Insurance
More about Climate Change

bookmark_borderA Capitalist Growth Economy

International Economics 101

“On a finite planet, endless economic growth is impossible.”

1) The US is built on a “capitalist growth economy”
2) A capitalistic growth economy is dependent on population growth
3) Inbreeding of ignorant racists is not a growth economy strategy (such as Germany did through World War II)
4) Immigration (such as Germany is doing now) is the answer

The United States should learn from Germany’s lessons.

Trade Wars, Teriffs, Taxes and Trade Restriction

Financial Forecast and Economic Outlook

bookmark_borderFloridians: You’re At Risk of Flooding

If you purchase real estate in a flood plain and obtain a mortgage, you will be required to purchase flood insurance.

Roy Wright oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program. In a presentation to the Insurance-& Risk-Linked Securities Conference, Wright said to forget about checking the flood plain maps and check your drivers license. “If it says Florida, you need flood insurance.” FEMA is examining properties on coasts and in flood plains that have been repeatedly rebuilt “that we probably shouldn’t be providing coverage on.”

The Miami Herald reported:

The national flood insurance program is now $20 billion in debt, largely because of Irma and other catastrophic storms like Harvey. Wright, during a break in the insurance conference, sat down with the Miami Herald to outline a plan to stabilize a troubled federal program vital to Florida’s real estate industry. It includes ambitious goals to double enrollment over the next five years amid a major makeover that will include more aggressive purchases of re-insurance and catastrophe bonds.

By law, only homes with federally-backed mortgages in high-risk zones are required to have insurance.

us flood map1
The National Flood Insurance Program provides nearly three times the number of policies in Florida as any other state.
National Flood Insurance Program

In the lead-up to Irma, an Associated Press analysis found that the number of Florida homes covered in high-risk areas had dropped by 15 percent in the previous five years. Fewer than half in hazard zones were protected from flood damage.

Wright blamed the problem partly on flood maps that, like hurricane tracking maps, can mislead homeowners on actual risks.

“We really gotta help people move beyond and quit focusing just on the lines,” he said. “Because nature, the day it rains, pays no attention to the lines.”

By contrast, when Harvey slammed the Texas coast, the national flood program insured 70 percent of the homes in moderate flood zones in Harris County. After the storm passed, 60 percent of the claims came from those moderate zones, proof that storms don’t always follow the contours of a flood map, Wright said.

“That’s true in areas of Florida as well,” he said.