bookmark_borderFUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt)

By Daniel Brouse
For Widgette / Private Business

Has America turned into a giant Tupperware Party?

The field of consumer behavior is a social science that studies the psychology of consumerism. There are five basic psychological tactics to marketing:
* emotional and psychological appeals
* optimize credibility by highlighting your flaws
* re-position your competition
* promote exclusivity
* introduce fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD)

Fear, Uncertainty, And Doubt (FUD)

The "Daisy Ad" Video
The “Daisy Ad” Video (Click for Video and Audio)

Fear is very powerful in marketing. An example of fear advertising happened when Lyndon Johnson ran against Barry Goldwater in 1964. Johnson wanted to stoke public fear that Goldwater would cause a nuclear war. The “Daisy ad” or “Peace, Little Girl” ran only one time. It showed a little girl picking petals from a daisy, followed by a nuclear explosion and Johnson ominously stating, “These are the stakes. To make a world in which all of God’s children can live, or to go into the dark.” Johnson won, carried 44 states, and took 61% of the vote in a landslide victory.

One of the first companies to use FUD as its business model is Tupperware. They pioneered the direct marketing strategy made famous by the Tupperware party. “A Tupperware party is run by a Tupperware ‘consultant’ for a host who invites friends and neighbors into his or her home to see the product line. Tupperware hosts are rewarded with free products based on the level of sales made at their party. Parties also take place in workplaces, schools, and other community groups.”

When friends and neighbors attend a Tupperware party, the host introduces fear, uncertainty, and doubt to the participants. The consumer is made to worry what their friends and neighbors will think of them if they don’t make a purchase. There is fear of being publicly humiliated and doubt whether you will be un-friended.

The most disturbing use of FUD is Donald J. Trump. The Donald has used every trick in the book when it comes to using fear, uncertainty and doubt to motivate people. The current atmosphere makes one wonder — “Has America turned into a giant Tupperware party?”

bookmark_borderTorture = Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

The United States’ Senate Intelligence Committee released a 6,000 page report detailing how the CIA tortured prisoners at Bagram, Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib. A 480 page summary gives a troubling overview. The BBC reports:

  • Were the interrogation methods – torture if you like – more extensive and more brutal than previously admitted? It looks like the conclusion is “Yes”
  • Did these interrogation techniques deliver life-saving intelligence to the US? That answer appears to be “No”
  • Were CIA officials at the time honest with the White House about the program? Again, “No”

Dianne Feinstein, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, referred to “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” as torture.

bookmark_borderWar Declared

Washington DC — On September 10, 2014 between 9PM and 9:15PM, President Obama declared war on the Islamic State (ISIS).

“Our objective is clear: We will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy.”

Critics raised debate on the irony of Obama going into Iraq after his position on getting out of Iraq.

President Obama Declaring War on ISIL
President Obama Declaring War on ISIL

bookmark_borderGun Control? We Need Bomb Control

PHILADELPHIA, PA — With all the uproar over the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shootings, ignorant and fearful Americans have been clamoring to take away the 2nd Amendment Rights. This makes no sense what-so-ever.

The 2nd Amendment was put into place so U.S. citizens could protect themselves from government.

However, instead of protecting themselves from the government, U.S. citizens have sanctioned the murders of many thousands of children. Through the use of bombs and drone attacks, the United States (aka U.S. citizens) are killing babies, children and mothers on a daily basis.

How any U.S. citizen can be such a hypocrite as to suggest gun control for random acts of violence, while being responsible for killing children around the world… is a mystery. We do not need gun control. We need bomb control. Or, better yet, what we really need is self control.

bookmark_borderSelf-immolation

In the last two days, six Tibetans set themselves on fire (self-immolate) in protest to Chinese rule. “These protests are aimed at sending the next generation of China’s unelected regime a clear signal that Tibetans will continue to fight for their freedom despite China’s efforts to suppress and intimidate them,” Free Tibet director Stephanie Brigden said in a statement.

Since 2011, over 60 Tibetans have self-immolated. Here is a sample of a few:

Dorjee Kyab, Dorjee and Samdup,Dorjee died. 7 November 2012  — In the first documented case of a triple self-immolation, three Tibetan monks in their early teens, aged 15 to 16, set fire to themselves calling for freedom.

Tamdin Tso, 7 November 2012 died

Tamdin Tso 7 November_0.JPG

23-year-old mother, Tamdin Tso, set fire to herself in Rebkong County, Eastern Tibet. She was mother to a 5-year-old boy. She died at the scene.

Lhamo Kyab, Bhora, 20 October 2012, died

Lhamokyeb square crop.jpeg

According to an eyewitness, Lhamo Kyab called out slogans for the return of the Dalai Lama while running towards Bhora Monastery.  Security forces tried to extinguish the flames but were unsuccessful. Lhamo Kyab died at the scene.

Sangye Gyatso, Kanlho Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 6 October 2012, died

Sangye Gyatso

The father of two set himself on fire near the Dokar Monastery, which is 10km from Tso City. He died at the scene.  Sangye Gyatso called for the return of the Dalai Lama and for cultural and religious freedom in Tibet.

Dolkar Kyi, Tso City, Kanlho, 7 August 2012, died

Dolkar Kyi 2012-08-07 crop square.jpg

Set herself on fire in front of Tso Monastery in Kanlho, Eastern Tibet. She died at the scene. After her protest, 15 military trucks were deployed to Tso Monastery, scene of the self-immolation.

Lobsang Tsultrim, Ngaba Town, 6 August 2012, died

Lobsang Tsultrim web crop square.jpg

The 21-year-old monk set fire to himself on the main road in Ngaba. He was reported to be still alive, his upper body badly injured, when security personnel drove him away in a vehicle. He died soon after.


 

According to Free Tibet:

Human Rights In Tibet

Tibetans’ civil and political rights are under constant attack by the Chinese authorities who will stop at nothing to suppress dissent.

Every aspect of Tibetan life is under siege from a Chinese leadership determined to gradually eradicate a whole culture.  The Tibetan flag and national anthem are banned. Possession of a picture of the Dalai Lama can result in torture and imprisonment.

No right to protest

Tibetans are not free to protest or openly speak about their situation. Even peaceful demonstrations are met with heavy handed, military crackdowns.

Military.jpg

In 2008, thousands of Tibetans staged the largest protests in Tibet for over 50 years. Demonstrations swept across the entire Tibetan plateau.  Chinese authorities arrested an estimated 6,000 protestors, of which the fate of about 1,000 still remains unknown.  The upsurge in protests and self-immolations in 2011 and 2012 has led the Chinese authorities to step up security even further and tighten its stranglehold on Tibet.

Political prisoners tortured

Prisons in Tibet are full of people detained for simply expressing their desire for freedom. People have been arrested and sentenced to prison for peaceful acts, such as:

  • waving the Tibetan flag
  • distributing leaflets
  • sending information about events in Tibet abroad

Human rights Child, pedro saraiva, credit.jpg

The Chinese deem these acts as ‘splittist’ or ‘subversive’. Many Tibetans are imprisoned on unclear or unspecified charges, their families not informed of their whereabouts. Released prisoners report of having been subjected to beatings, electric shocks, and being deprived of food and drink. A 2008 UN report found that the use of torture in Tibet was ‘widespread’ and ‘routine’.

Restricting information

China attempts to control all information in and out of Tibet. TV, radio, printed media and the internet are subjected to strict monitoring and censorship. Access is blocked to TV and radio broadcasters based outside China, which provide news services in Tibetan languages.  Foreign journalists are rarely allowed entry into Tibet, and when they are, they are closely chaperoned by Chinese officials.

Reporters Without Borders ranked China 174 out of the 179 countries on its Press Freedom Index 2011/12.

Lack of religious freedom

kaiash1_nocredit.jpg

Buddhism is central to Tibetan life and monasteries and nunneries are kept under tight surveillance. Police stations are often situated nearby (or inside).  Monks and nuns are regularly subjected to ‘patriotic re-education programmes’, for weeks at a time.  During these programs, they are forced to read ‘patriotic’ literature denouncing the Dalai Lama.  Those who refuse to take part, or fail the programme, often have their rights to practice as monks and nuns taken away.

Political rights

A US State Department human rights report published in May 2012 said that “ethnic Han Chinese Communist Party members hold almost all top government, police, and military positions in the Tibet Autonomous Region and other areas of Tibet.”

bookmark_borderPublishing

It is impossible to unpublish something. Unpublish is not even a word.

To attempt to unpublish something is worse than futile. Please, just consider the last of the famous to try.

Book burning – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_burning

Book burning (also biblioclasm or libricide) is the practice of destroying, often …. A much-quoted line in Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita is … Fahrenheit 451, stating, “It follows then that when Hitler burned a book I felt it as keenly, …

Then, please consider basic human law:

First Amendment to the United States Constitution – Wikipedia, the …

en.wikipedia.org/…/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constit…

The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an …

My suggestion: if you do not like the truth that has been published, please create a better reality for us.  Thank you.

by Daniel Brouse

bookmark_borderAustralia: top judge to face court over sedition charge

  1. News for charged with sedition australia


    Fijivillage
    1. Restraint urged after PNG charges judge

      The Australian‎ – 6 hours ago
      JULIA Gillard has urged political parties in Papua New Guinea to show restraint after police arrested the country’s chief justice and charged him …
    1. Radio Australia‎ – 17 hours ago
  2. Australian sedition law – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_sedition_law

    Lance Sharkey, then General-Secretary of the Communist Party of Australia, was charged that, in March 1949 he: uttered the following seditious words: “If Soviet …

  3. Sedition – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition

    Australia‘s sedition laws were amended in anti-terrorism legislation passed on 6 … were sought to be charged with sedition for advocating independence for the …

  4. PNG’s chief justice charged with sedition – ABC News (Australian …

    www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-25/…charged-with-sedition/4032678

    2 hours ago – Radio Australia’s Pacific correspondent Campbell Cooney discusses the arrest of chief justice Sir Salamo Injia in Papua New Guinea.

  5. PNG chief justice charged with sedition – ABC News (Australian …

    www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-24/png-deputy-pm…/4031378

    22 hours ago – Police in Papua New Guinea have charged the country’s chief justice with sedition after a dramatic attempt to arrest him in court.

  6. PNG top judge charged with sedition | ABC Radio Australia

    www.radioaustralia.net.au/…/2012…charged-with-sedition/949652

    14 hours ago – News, current affairs & topical conversations from Australia, Asia and the Pacific … He was then charged with sedition and released on bail.

  7. Political turmoil in PNG as Chief Justice is charged with sedition | Asia

    www.radioaustralia.net.au/…in…charged-with-sedition/949858

    16 hours ago – News, current affairs & topical conversations from Australia, Asia and the … Guinea have charged the country’s chief justice with sedition after a …

  8. Australia Network News:Stories:PNG top judge charged with sedition

    australianetworknews.com/stories/201205/3510337.htm?desktop

    10 hours ago – Police in Papua New Guinea have charged the country’s chief justice with sedition after a dramatic attempt to arrest him in court.

  9. Papua New Guinean chief justice charged with sedition – China Daily

    www.chinadaily.com.cn/xinhua/2012-05-25/content_6006431.html

    2 hours ago – He was then charged with sedition and released on bail, the ABC reported. Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr has contacted the PNG …

  10. Sky News: PNG top judge charged with sedition

    www.skynews.com.au/world/article.aspx?id=753823&vId=

    7 hours ago – Local media says Papua New Guinea’s chief justice has been charged with sedition and will appear in court this morning. Chief Justice Sir …

bookmark_borderWill the New Owners of FaceBook Be Responsible?

PHILADELPHIA, PA: The word on the street is FaceBook may be going public (in an IPO) as soon as this coming week.

Will the new owners of FaceBook, those people who buy shares, be responsible for my privacy and security? Is it possible for individual shareholders to be accountable for what their company does?

At one point in time, people believed the corporate umbrella might shield them from illegal activities. Then, board members and executives found they were the defendants in civil and criminal suits. They thought a new type of insurance would protect them. It does not.

bookmark_borderPresident Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law

by the American Civil Liberties Union

WASHINGTON, DC – President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law today. The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision. While President Obama issued a signing statement saying he had “serious reservations” about the provisions, the statement only applies to how his administration would use the authorities granted by the NDAA, and would not affect how the law is interpreted by subsequent administrations. The White House had threatened to veto an earlier version of the NDAA, but reversed course shortly before Congress voted on the final bill.

“President Obama’s action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,” said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU executive director. “The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield. The ACLU will fight worldwide detention authority wherever we can, be it in court, in Congress, or internationally.”

Under the Bush administration, similar claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen detained on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress now assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way again. The ACLU believes that any military detention of American citizens or others within the United States is unconstitutional and illegal, including under the NDAA. In addition, the breadth of the NDAA’s detention authority violates international law because it is not limited to people captured in the context of an actual armed conflict as required by the laws of war.

“We are incredibly disappointed that President Obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court,” said Romero. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the war on terror was extinguished today. Thankfully, we have three branches of government, and the final word belongs to the Supreme Court, which has yet to rule on the scope of detention authority. But Congress and the president also have a role to play in cleaning up the mess they have created because no American citizen or anyone else should live in fear of this or any future president misusing the NDAA’s detention authority.”

The bill also contains provisions making it difficult to transfer suspects out of military detention, which prompted FBI Director Robert Mueller to testify that it could jeopardize criminal investigations. It also restricts the transfers of cleared detainees from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay to foreign countries for resettlement or repatriation, making it more difficult to close Guantanamo, as President Obama pledged to do in one of his first acts in office.

bookmark_borderJust Say No To Taxes

by Daniel Brouse

I suggested that there should be little (to no) taxes.

You responded:
How does any of this function
without taxation…?
I would like to know your thinking on this…
it doesn’t seem to be working now
and sure doesn’t favor poor to middle class…
but I think this is too long to write?

I respond:
There are a few ways one can look upon it. Here are two of the shorter versions —

1) Evolution
In the beginning there was Adam and Lilith. There were no taxes. For more generations than I can count, the world got along fine without taxes. In fact, humans prospered in the Garden Of Edan without taxation until we evolved into corrupt beings.

2) Exploitation And Corruption
An economic evaluation of taxation reveals a costs and benefits shutout. That is to say, there are no known benefits to taxation. On the other hand, there are at least a trillion costs to taxing (see the National Deficit for a an exhaustive list.) A small sampling includes…
The cost of taxing productive people
The cost of corruption inherent in collecting money
The cost of additional bureaucracy
The cost of removing the efficiency inherent in the competition of the free market place

You may want to think of it this way… every adult in the USA owes about $42,614.99 just for the Iraq War. (And, that is if we pay off the debt today. Oh, yeah. The cost of life and limb is not included.)

Next time, in order to be fair to everyone… maybe we should be required to pay the tax in advance… instead of 1% of the population footing 40% of the bill?

Additional resources: Occupy Wall Street? Occupy Yourself