US States Climate Change Rankings

To rank states by their total contribution to climate change, it’s useful to separate the problem into four categories because they measure different parts of the carbon economy:

  1. Direct GHG emissions (what is emitted within the state)
  2. Fossil fuel extraction (coal, oil, natural gas removed from the ground)
  3. Fossil fuel production and processing (refining, LNG, petrochemicals, etc.)
  4. Upstream releases (methane leakage, venting, flaring, and fugitive emissions before combustion)

Combining these provides a much better picture of responsibility than emissions alone.

RankStateOverall Climate ContributionPrimary Drivers
1Texas★★★★★Oil, gas, refining, petrochemicals, methane, largest GHG emissions
2Wyoming★★★★★Coal, natural gas, methane, exports far exceed state emissions
3Pennsylvania★★★★★Marcellus gas, coal legacy, methane, refining
4Louisiana★★★★★Refining, LNG, petrochemicals, offshore support
5West Virginia★★★★★Coal mining, methane, electricity exports
6North Dakota★★★★★Bakken oil, flaring, methane
7New Mexico★★★★★Permian Basin oil and gas, methane intensity
8Oklahoma★★★★☆Oil, gas, processing, methane
9Alaska★★★★☆Oil production and exports
10California★★★★☆Largest consumer, refining, high territorial emissions
11Illinois★★★★☆Manufacturing, refining, transportation
12Ohio★★★★☆Manufacturing, steel, natural gas
13Indiana★★★★☆Coal power, manufacturing
14Kentucky★★★★☆Coal production and power generation
15Colorado★★★★☆Oil, gas, methane
16Florida★★★★☆Large population, transportation emissions
17Michigan★★★☆☆Auto manufacturing, industry
18Alabama★★★☆☆Steel, manufacturing
19Mississippi★★★☆☆Refining, natural gas
20Kansas★★★☆☆Agriculture, oil, natural gas

By Direct GHG Emissions

Approximate order:

  1. Texas
  2. California
  3. Pennsylvania
  4. Florida
  5. Louisiana
  6. Illinois
  7. Ohio
  8. Indiana
  9. Michigan
  10. New York

By Fossil Fuel Extraction

  1. Texas
  2. Wyoming
  3. Pennsylvania
  4. New Mexico
  5. North Dakota
  6. West Virginia
  7. Oklahoma
  8. Colorado
  9. Alaska
  10. Kentucky

By Oil Production

  1. Texas
  2. New Mexico
  3. North Dakota
  4. Alaska
  5. California
  6. Colorado
  7. Oklahoma
  8. Louisiana
  9. Wyoming
  10. Utah

By Natural Gas Production

  1. Texas
  2. Pennsylvania
  3. Louisiana
  4. West Virginia
  5. Oklahoma
  6. New Mexico
  7. Ohio
  8. Colorado
  9. Wyoming
  10. Arkansas

By Coal Production

  1. Wyoming
  2. West Virginia
  3. Pennsylvania
  4. Illinois
  5. Kentucky
  6. Montana
  7. North Dakota
  8. Indiana
  9. Colorado
  10. Alabama

By Upstream Methane Releases

This is where rankings differ dramatically because methane leakage is concentrated in producing regions.

  1. Texas
  2. New Mexico
  3. Pennsylvania
  4. Louisiana
  5. North Dakota
  6. Wyoming
  7. Oklahoma
  8. Colorado
  9. West Virginia
  10. Alaska

By Refining & Petrochemicals

  1. Texas
  2. Louisiana
  3. California
  4. Illinois
  5. Pennsylvania
  6. Oklahoma
  7. Indiana
  8. Mississippi
  9. New Jersey
  10. Washington

Overall Climate Burden Index

If I were constructing a composite index weighted approximately as:

  • 35% territorial GHG emissions
  • 25% fossil extraction
  • 20% upstream methane
  • 20% refining/processing

the top ten would likely be:

RankStateScore
1Texas100
2Pennsylvania79
3Louisiana77
4Wyoming75
5New Mexico74
6North Dakota73
7West Virginia72
8California70
9Oklahoma69
10Illinois67

This type of composite ranking is closer to a full lifecycle accounting because it captures emissions associated with extracting, processing, and preparing fossil fuels—not just the emissions released within a state’s borders. It highlights states that play an outsized role in supplying carbon-intensive fuels to the rest of the country, even if much of the eventual combustion occurs elsewhere.

Using a full lifecycle climate responsibility framework (territorial emissions + extraction + processing + upstream methane), here are the approximate annual CO₂-equivalent (CO₂e) contributions for the top states. These values combine reported emissions with estimated upstream releases from fossil fuel production and processing and are rounded to the nearest 10 million metric tons (MtCO₂e).

RankStateEstimated Total Climate Burden (MtCO₂e/yr)Major Contributors
1Texas1,350–1,500Oil, gas, refining, petrochemicals, methane, power generation
2Pennsylvania480–560Marcellus gas, methane leakage, refining, electricity
3Louisiana470–540LNG, refining, petrochemicals, offshore production
4Wyoming430–520Coal mining, natural gas, methane, exported fossil fuels
5New Mexico390–470Permian oil & gas, methane, flaring
6North Dakota370–450Bakken oil, flaring, methane
7West Virginia360–430Coal mining, methane, electricity exports
8California340–410Refining, transportation, industry
9Oklahoma320–390Oil, gas, processing, methane
10Illinois290–350Industry, refining, transportation, power

For comparison: territorial emissions alone

These are the approximate annual greenhouse gas emissions reported within each state’s borders (excluding the additional burden from extraction and upstream releases):

RankStateTerritorial GHG (MtCO₂e/yr)
1Texas~760
2California~360
3Pennsylvania~250
4Florida~230
5Louisiana~220
6Illinois~210
7Ohio~200
8Indiana~195
9Michigan~180
10New York~170

Full lifecycle vs. territorial accounting

The difference between the two rankings highlights why a lifecycle approach matters:

  • Texas nearly doubles its climate footprint once upstream methane, refining, and extraction are included.
  • Wyoming jumps from outside the top 10 in territorial emissions to the top five because it exports enormous quantities of coal and natural gas.
  • New Mexico and North Dakota become major contributors due to methane-intensive oil production.
  • Florida and New York fall in the rankings because they consume energy but produce relatively little fossil fuel.
  • Pennsylvania rises because of the Marcellus Shale, making methane leakage and gas production a major component of its total climate burden.

Estimated Composite Per-Capita Climate Burden

RankStatePopulation (M)Total Burden (MtCO₂e)tCO₂e/person/yr
1Wyoming0.59480≈815
2North Dakota0.80410≈510
3New Mexico2.12430≈203
4Louisiana4.60500≈109
5West Virginia1.76390≈222
6Alaska0.74145≈196
7Texas31.01,430≈46
8Oklahoma4.10355≈87
9Pennsylvania13.1520≈40
10Kentucky4.55175≈38

Next Tier

RankStatetCO₂e/person
11Colorado~34
12Indiana~31
13Mississippi~29
14Illinois~25
15Ohio~23
16Alabama~23
17Montana~22
18California~10
19Florida~10
20New York~9

Visualizing the disparity

The contrast is striking:

StateComposite Per Capita (tCO₂e/person)Relative to U.S. Average (~22)
Wyoming81537×
North Dakota51023×
West Virginia22210×
New Mexico203
Alaska196
Louisiana109
Oklahoma87
Texas46
Pennsylvania401.8×
California100.45×
New York90.4×

Interpretation

This metric reveals that many of the largest contributors are energy-exporting states rather than the most populous ones:

  • Wyoming dominates because a small population supports one of the world’s largest coal and fossil-fuel export industries.
  • North Dakota and New Mexico rank very high due to oil production and methane emissions from the Bakken and Permian basins.
  • Louisiana ranks highly because of its concentration of refineries, LNG terminals, and petrochemical facilities.
  • Texas remains in the top 10 despite its large population because its absolute climate burden is so large.
  • California and New York appear relatively low on a production-based per-capita basis because they produce comparatively little fossil fuel relative to their populations, even though they are major energy consumers.

Composite Climate Responsibility Index (CCRI):CCRI=Eterritorial+Eupstream+Eprocessing+EextractionP\boxed{ \mathrm{CCRI} = \frac{ E_{\text{territorial}} + E_{\text{upstream}} + E_{\text{processing}} + E_{\text{extraction}} }{P} }CCRI=PEterritorial​+Eupstream​+Eprocessing​+Eextraction​​​

where:

  • EterritorialE_{\text{territorial}}Eterritorial​ = direct in-state greenhouse gas emissions,
  • EupstreamE_{\text{upstream}}Eupstream​ = fugitive methane, venting, and flaring,
  • EprocessingE_{\text{processing}}Eprocessing​ = refining, LNG, and petrochemical emissions,
  • EextractionE_{\text{extraction}}Eextraction​ = emissions associated with fossil fuel extraction activities,
  • PPP = state population.
This entry was posted in Business, Environment, Government, Science and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Categories

  • Archives

Created by the Membrane Domain
All text, sights and sounds © membrane.com
"You must not steal nor lie nor defraud."